White-Handed Gibbon, Hylobates lar
WHITE-HANDED GIBBON
Hylobates lar
Geographic Distribution and Habitat
To get to know the white-handed gibbon, we’ll have to venture to a corner of the globe where island nations, cast like tea leaves across a sapphire sea, meet the rugged mountains, steaming jungles, and emerald rice paddies of the Indochinese Peninsula. White-handed gibbons are charismatic and captivating creatures residing in a narrow strip of territory that spans from a region just south of the Nanding He River on Myanmar’s eastern border with China, down through Thailand and the western forests of Laos through the tip of peninsular Malaysia, and all the way across the Strait of Malacca to the northern tip of the island of Sumatra (Indonesia). At one time they were even present in regions of southwest China, but some years have passed since white-handed gibbons were last seen in these forests.
These rainforests are among the most ancient, complex, and species-rich ecosystems on Earth, harboring an incredibly rich array of life. White-handed gibbons share the neighborhood with orangutans, tigers, clouded leopards, Asian elephants, and Sumatran rhinoceroses to name just a few of the astounding creatures in this neck of the jungle. Many of these species are relics of ancient lineages that have gone extinct in the rest of the world. This is the last refuge left for them.
In these diverse regions, the wet, humid climate nurtures dense, evergreen rainforests with towering, ancient trees. This is great for the arboreal white-handed gibbon who spends practically every second navigating the upper canopies, up to 3,900 feet (1,200 m) above sea level. They swing and walk from branch to branch throughout their home ranges which span between 42 to 100 acres (17 and 40 hectares). On these woody highways, they search for delectable foods among the riotous vegetation: weeping figs, council trees, monkey jack, pulasan, clustertree, oriental trema, cowa fruit trees, and creeping liana vines
White-handed gibbons find themselves in a wide range of habitats, a reflection of their remarkable knack for adaptation. They might be found in dipterocarp forests, lowland and submontane rainforests, deciduous bamboo forests, peat swamp forests, or seasonal evergreen forests. These forests are home to more species than any other terrestrial ecosystem on Earth.
Life in these forests is shaped, as always, by the seasons. In Thailand, Laos, and Myanmar there are three main seasons: rainy/monsoon season, cool/dry season, and hot/dry season. Depending on the country and region, the monsoon season arrives between May and October, bringing with it heavy rains, humidity, and vibrant, lush landscapes. Mornings tend to be sunny while frequent heavy downpours occur for short periods in the afternoon or evening. Roughly around October or November, the cool/dry season begins, bringing with it clear skies, low humidity, and pleasant temperatures. On the Malaysian peninsula and the Indonesian island of Sumatra, there are only two seasons: the dry season (April to September), which sees little rainfall, and the rainy season (October to March), where the monsoons bring heavy rainfall.
These are the natural forces that shape the lives of white-handed gibbons.
The white-handed gibbon’s genus name: “hylobates”, meaning “forest walker” in Greek. And, true to its name, it’s not uncommon for the white-handed gibbon to walk upright on branches high above the forest floor, all white waving their hands in the air.
Differences in fur color prompted researchers to classify five potential subspecies: the Carpenter’s lar, H. l. carpenteri , the Central lar, H. l. entelloides, the Malysian lar, H. l. lar , and the Sumatran lar, l. vestitus. The Yunnan lar, H. l. yunnanensis, is tragically thought to be extinct, having once lived in the southern Chinese province of Yunnan, boarding Myanmar, Laos, and Vietnam. Though all might not yet be lost, and there could still be a few white-handed gibbons hidden in these dense forests.
In some regions, white-handed gibbons and pileated gibbons may create hybrid groups typified by an intermediate hybrid female accompanied by either white-handed, pileated, or hybrid males.
Size, Weight, and Lifespan
In the wild, white-handed gibbons live to about 30 years old on average. In captivity, they commonly live to 44 years or more.
On average, male white-handed gibbons are ever so slightly larger than females.
Head-to-body length in males ranges from 17 to 23 inches (43.5 to 58.5 cm), and they weigh between 11 and 16.8 pounds (5 to 7.6 kg).
Head-to-body length in females ranges from 16.5 to 22.8 inches (42 to 58 cm), and they weigh between 9.7 to 15 pounds(4.4 to 6.8 kg).
Gibbon males and females are more or less the same size. In science, this is referred to as sexual monomorphism.
Appearance
The inspiration behind their namesake is the tufts of white hair on their hands and feet that lend themselves to the name white-handed gibbon?
From a ring of white hair that surrounds their black, hairless face peeks two emotive, blackish-amber eyes. Below these, white-handed gibbons have a short, small muzzle punctuated by a rather flat nose. They can have noticeable hairs around the mouth, not unlike a very thin mustache or silvery five-o’clock shadow.
Gibbons, like all apes, do not have tails to assist them in the trees. Their arms significantly exceed the length of their legs. This allows them to successfully propel themselves through the branches, a movement known as brachiation. This requires the gibbon to alternatively support their body one arm at a time while swinging from branch to branch. They can also hang from a branch with both arms extended. At the ends of these arms are long hands with curved, hook-like fingers that assist in grasping branches. Their short legs provide pushing power during brachiation. With opposable big toes, similar to our thumbs, their feet are well-adapted for grasping branches. They can even run bipedally on thicker branches to traverse short distances or escape threats.
When it comes to overall pelage, white-handed gibbon’s coats can range from black and dark brown to light brown, sandy, buff, or creamy. Both the light and dark versions have significant nuances in color. Their coat, known as pelage, is dense and helps keep white-handed gibbons dry during all that rain come monsoon season.
Understanding how a gibbon gets its coat color may trigger memories of grade school science lessons about dominant and recessive genes. In the case of gibbons, if both parents have light hair, their offspring will have light hair. If both parents have dark hair, their offspring will have dark hair. If one of the parents has a dark coat and the other parent has a light coat, the baby will exhibit the coloration of the dominant gene: a dark-colored coat. In this case, light-colored coats are recessive.
As you’ll recall from the section on taxonomy, subspecies designation was determined by differences in coat coloration. So how do the subspecies differ in pelage color? The Malaysian lar can be dark chocolate or medium brown with a slightly lighter torso. The lighter variation is creamy in coloration but can have an orangish hue. The Carpenter’s lar is long-haired and practically pitch black or brownish charcoal. Their lighter variation is creamy white or white-buff. The Central lar gibbon is a shade of black or black-brown, and their light pelage is the color of honey with darker legs. Finally, the Sumatran lar gibbon is always light in color — typically light brown with a buff back, pale lower back, and a brown head, abdomen, and limbs.
On their rear end, they have a small area of tough, hairless, leathery skin known as ischial callosities. These are like built-in butt pads that create a firm and supportive cushion while sitting. Gibbons spend much of their time sitting on branches of varying widths and textures. These calloused pads provide comfort and stability. They can also provide some protection from friction in cases where their rump might rub against tree bark. When night comes, they sleep sitting up. The butt pad provides comfort and stability, allowing them to sleep soundly through the night without risk of falling.
Diet
White-handed gibbons zip around the forest as if they were on a sugar high. This is unsurprising given their favorite food is fruit, which is high in fructose (sugars). Above all, they love figs, which make up nearly half of their diet. Figs don’t contain as many nutrients as other sugary fruits in the gibbon’s diet, but they make up for this by being available in large patches and fruiting asynchronously, meaning they are a relatively reliable food source throughout the year.
In addition to figs, white-handed gibbons enjoy other fruits (such as those from the liana vine), especially fruits with soft, sugary pulp compared to ones with hard seeds or tough husks. Other additions to their diet include berries, leafy plants, flowers, young leaves, new shoots, insects, and, on occasion, some birds’ eggs. The composition of their diet fluctuates with the seasons. Over the span of four months, a white-handed gibbon’s diet will transform completely. In Thailand’s cool season, for instance, white-handed gibbons will mostly consume flowers, but they prefer fruit during the hot, wet season. In November and December, figs abound, and white-handed gibbons delight in feasting on them. During peak season, it is not uncommon for gibbons to revisit the same fruit trees multiple times to make sure they got every last morsel.
Interestingly, white-handed gibbons are choosy about which foods they eat, preferring those high in carbohydrates and sugars, like fructose and glucose, over other types of macronutrients like proteins and lipids. They will even taste-test different pieces of fruit to find the ripest one with the highest concentration of sugars while discarding the rest to the forest floor.
White-handed gibbons have an exceptional geo-spatial memory for food sources. This comes in handy when competing with other species for food. Pig-tailed macaques, long-tailed macaques, dusky leaf monkeys, and siamangs all want their own slice of the pie, so to speak.
White-handed gibbons will share food with one another. Rather than pure acts of kindness, this gesture is thought to serve as an act of appeasement. It is thought to help reduce social tensions and maintain group cohesion within their small family groups.
To hydrate, white-handed gibbons use their hands to scoop up water to drink from tree holes or wet leaves. This behavior allows them to hydrate while staying in the trees.
Behavior and Lifestyle
As the morning sun crowns the horizon casting warm rays through foliage touched by cool dew drops, nighttime flees in the form of long shadows cast by trees and branches, and our gibbons awake. A long call from the breeding male of the group heralds the new dawn. His call lasts nearly 11 minutes and can be heard for over half a mile away (1 km). It’s a territorial warning to rival gibbons as much as it is an alarm clock to his snoozing family. Still shaking sleep from their eyes and limbs, the family members relieve their bladders at the ends of their sleeping branches and begin their day of work, locating fruits to eat.
From branch to branch they travel with effortless, fluid agility thanks to supremely long arms fitted with highly flexible ball-and-socket wrist joints. These strong and flexible arms can propel them through the trees nearly 50 feet (15m) per swing and at up to 35 miles per hour (56 km/h). Although their legs are far shorter than their arms, the legs help with balance while swinging through the air. They also use their powerful leg to traverse thick branches bipedally, a task they accomplish by waving their long arms above and beside them to maintain balance like a tightrope walker. All in all, they spend about 24 percent of their day traveling around their territory looking for food.
Adept as they may be at traversing the trees, they aren’t immune to the occasional fall. This can happen when a hand loses grip or a branch snaps. For this reason, it’s not uncommon for gibbons to suffer one or more bone fractures during their lifetime.
White-handed gibbons spend about a third (33 percent) of their day foraging. This comes out to about 8 to 9 hours a day on average. As they search for food, white-handed gibbons stick to the upper canopy of the forest, rarely descending to the understory. Typically, they are found feeding about 78 feet (24 m) above ground level. This helps them to avoid competition with other primates in the area, like macaques who feed at lower levels.
Like their great ape cousins, white-handed gibbons have been observed using tools to extract food sources. In the wild, they use twigs and sticks to pry bark from trees and probe crevices to get at insects underneath. In captivity, they will use rakes to obtain out-of-reach food and can use cloth as a sponge to collect water.
Being diurnal, gibbons are awake during daylight hours, and the night is reserved for sleep. They spend roughly a quarter of their day (26 percent) resting. About three to four hours before the sun dips below the horizon, white-handed gibbons begin their search for sleeping trees. As sleep researcher Allan Rechtschaffen once said, “If sleep doesn’t serve an absolutely vital function, it is the greatest mistake evolution ever made.” This is because, during sleep, one becomes vulnerable to predation. White-handed gibbons employ a large range of strategies during the night to stay safe.
The sleeping trees they select are always different from the ones they chose the night before. Typically, the trees are chosen only once, though some may be reused by the same or different group members at a later date. They tend to be among the tallest trees available. Habitat does not influence their choice of sleeping trees. Rather, these trees can be anywhere throughout their home ranges and can even overlap with neighboring groups, adding a layer of unpredictability to their sleeping patterns to evade predators. Upon finding an adequate set of trees, they have a routine bedtime ritual. All becomes quiet. The typically noisy gibbons grow silent and the ritual begins. Females with infants enter the sleeping trees first, followed by juveniles, and then subadult, and adult males. Group members select different trees, except for mothers with infants who share a branch.
Unlike other apes, gibbons don’t build nests or alter the vegetation where they sleep. Thanks to the thick pads on their butts, they sleep upright on branches. Once they are adequately settled and feel safe, they sleep between 14-17 hours per night.
White-handed gibbons have lots of predators to look out for cloud leopards, tigers, pythons, hawks, and eagles. They deploy a variety of strategies to defend against these predators. For instance, they are known to “mob” some predators, such as pythons or leopards, by approaching them closer and belting out a predator-specific song that alerts other gibbons to the threat. These gutsy primates will approach a predator as close as 15-30 feet from it, ostensibly as a way to get in their face and tell them the gigs up, they’ve been spotted. Multiple gibbons will then join in the loud predator song, confronting the threat as a group.
When facing formidable foes like tigers, leopards, and snakes, white-handed gibbons will excessively defecate, a sign of high stress. This is a crucial biological response to life-threatening situations. Essentially, this allows an animal to “lighten the load”, so to speak, and get away more quickly. All of this is regulated by the sympathetic nervous system, which controls the “fight or flight” response.
White-handed gibbons are distinguished from great apes by their smaller size and low sexual dimorphism.
Early followers of Taoism once ascribed occult properties to gibbons, believing them capable of living for several hundred years and possessing the ability to turn into humans. Gibbons, particularly white-handed gibbons, were seen as innately adept at circulating and absorbing qi (life force) through Taoist practices like daoyin (guiding and pulling). Gibbons are featured in Taoist poetry, such as the poem, “The Remedy” by Shih Tê, celebrating the joys of seclusion.
White-handed gibbons maintain small family groups consisting of a typically monogamous adult male and adult female and their offspring, totaling somewhere between two and six members altogether. Offspring will stay with the parents for 7 to 8 years when they reach sexual maturity and disperse to form their own breeding pairs.
While this is the most common formation of the group, composition can vary slightly. In some less common cases, groups may have multiple adult males or females. On some occasions, white-handed gibbons and pileated gibbons may create hybrid groups typified by an intermediate hybrid female accompanied by either white-handed, pileated, or hybrid males, forming a multi-male, one-female trio.
For a long time, it was thought that males and females in the bonding pair were co-dominant. While this is mostly the case, females tend to assume a greater role in coordinating group activities, particularly when it comes to moving the group and finding food. Females tend to take the lead, guiding the group when traveling and are usually the first to arrive at food sources. When food sources are scarce, this leading female eats first and consumes more food than the others. This is likely a behavior shaped by evolution that allows her to offset the higher caloric costs of reproduction.
Naturally, the demands of the female reproductive cycle will impact this leadership position. When females are not pregnant or lactating, they are more likely to lead movements. While pregnant or lactating, they will temporarily take a back seat to others.
These groups form home ranges that remain highly stable over time. Collective memory and knowledge of these home ranges passed from parent to offspring help to maintain this stability long term. While stable, the size of this home range fluctuates with the size of the group. The length of migratory paths around the range increases as the ages of the infants and juveniles increase. The reverse is also true. When a new member of the group is born, the amount of territory covered by the family group decreases, ostensibly to give the mother and the baby more resting time. Overall, the presence of a newborn decreases the activity levels of the adults, leading to more rest and care for the infant.
Each day the group takes an hour-long break from foraging and feeding to rest and play. Individuals spend a significant amount of this time grooming one another. In fact, about 5 percent of their active day is dedicated to grooming. This behavior helps to both strengthen social bonds and plays a role in hygienic care. They preferentially groom specific body parts that are prone to parasites and dirt, specifically the upper body, which is more difficult to reach on one’s own. As such, grooming is treated as a valuable commodity in gibbon groups. During periods of female fertility, males may increase the strategic use of grooming to gain mating opportunities with their female partners. In response to the increase in grooming, females will reciprocate grooming to the male, potentially as a way to balance the exchange.
Gibbons use territorial calls in the morning to keep rival gibbons at bay. These are coordinated duets between the mating male and female that announce and defend their home range. Typically, these calls elicit counter-calling from neighboring groups. This ritual vocalization reduces the chances of encountering neighboring groups, thereby reducing the chances of conflict.
However, this doesn’t always work out as planned. Home ranges for different gibbon groups can overlap, meaning rival groups may come into contact with one another. While white-handed gibbons are known to defend their territory, these encounters are far less confrontational than researchers initially thought. Sharing an overlapping home region means that, over time, neighboring groups become habituated to one another. When two habituated groups come together, encounters last longer than with unhabituated groups. Juveniles from different groups may play together; adults will feed and rest together; and sometimes groups will even temporarily travel together. Adult males from other groups are sometimes allowed close to infants and will even interact playfully with them, suggesting a more complex kinship structure extending to neighboring groups. This is a much more friendly picture than the one of aggression between groups that has been painted for years and suggests that gibbon social structure is more fluid and interconnected than previously thought.
That said, competition over resources does occur. While females take the lead in discovering food sources, males often take the lead in responding to threats from neighboring groups. Territorial aggression is typically ritualized between male white-handed gibbons, meaning it involves postures, vocalizations, and movements that allow the conflict to be de-escalated before becoming violent. Even so, when fights occur, they can be lethal and death can sometimes follow these fights as a result of infected wounds.
Research suggests these fights can occur as a result of defending mating rights to a female. While predominantly monogamous, copulation outside of a bonded pair can occur. This suggests that white-handed gibbons may use alternative mating strategies as ways to confuse paternity. Sometimes the dominant female will come across other males when her pair-bonded male is away. During these encounters, she increases her vocalizations. Researchers are not sure whether these vocalizations are a way to manage risks associated with her mate being away or to attract these rival males. Interestingly, subadult males seem to remain in their natal group for longer periods, possibly to assist in defense. Sometimes additional male partners are welcomed peacefully into the group. In larger, resource-poor territories, there are often longer instances of polyandry or multiple male partners. This is an example of how white-handed gibbon groups will use multiple males to increase territorial and female defense, thereby enhancing their reproductive success.
Along the river’s edge, the dark forest rises like an impenetrable wall, behind which hidden insects buzz, rattle, and whine; birds chirp, whistle, and chide; unseen. Suddenly, the air is filled with what sounds like water drops resonating as they plunk into deep jungle pools, followed by a piercing, long, liquid note that spirals above the canopy and plummets back down to earth. It is swooping and sweet, as melodious as any bird, but mystifying and otherworldly. To hear a gibbon’s song is to listen to a sound as ancient as the forests from which it resonates.
White-handed gibbons are known for their beautiful and unique vocalizations. As we will see, these vocalizations are not only delightful to hear, but they are complexly and subtly saturated with significance in ways that are reminiscent of human syntax.
White-handed gibbons spend about 4 percent of their day vocalizing. This is high compared to other apes. Their neighbor in some regions, the orangutan, for instance, is relatively quiet, vocalizing infrequently except for long calling bouts by flanged males during mating season. Likewise, Africa’s chimpanzees only vocalize for about 1-2 percent of their day, and typically in short-range communication. Africa’s gorillas, on the other hand, spend roughly 3 percent of their day vocalizing.
This isn’t the only way that gibbon communication is unique. In the animal kingdom, there are estimated to be only 14 species that “sing”. Among primates, these include a Madagascar lemur called the indri, the titi monkeys of South America, tarsiers, and, of course, our gibbons. But why call them songs; why not simply call them vocalizations and leave it at that? Have the scientists gone all poetic on us? Not exactly. “Songs” refer to a specific temporal pattern consisting of several notes repeating.
There are two main “songs” in a white-handed gibbon’s repertoire: the great call/pair-bonded duet and the predator song. As far as their note repertoire goes, both of these songs are identical, meaning they use the same sounds or “notes”, but rearranged in subtle and unique ways, and certain “notes”, as we will see, are more or less prevalent in each.
Before noon each day, the family gathers together at the edge of their territory. There are a few introductory notes from both the male and female and then the dominant female of the family group produces a series of very loud notes, accelerating in tempo and ascending in pitch followed by trills that build into a bubbling crescendo. It is a part of the gibbon’s song, but not the song itself. It will be followed up by the male-female duet. The call lasts between 17 and 45 seconds and can exceed 100 decibels of sound pressure at close range, traveling over half a mile (1km) away. It needs to travel far to send a message. This great call is thought to mean something along the lines of “This is my territory, stay out!” To deliver this kind of message they have to be audible well beyond the gibbon’s territorial borders.
This is because white-handed gibbon family groups have a home range they defend from intruders. The great call gives white-handed gibbons a sense of the borders, though these often overlap. To reach the largest number of bordering gibbons, the female chooses a high vantage point so that her voice will carry across the treetops. The great call preferentially takes place from tall trees in primary forests located on upper hill slopes, hill or ridge tops.
Then something extraordinary happens: the male and the female sing together. This is the pair-bonded duet. It is loud and can last up to 11 minutes. The duet typically consists of multiple great call sequences, and each one of the singing pair has its own unique variation on the theme. Between the great call sequences in the duet, there is other singing known as “interlude songs”. These “interlude” songs actually make up the bulk of the singing in the duet, and compose the final stanza of the song.
Notably, each individual’s part varies slightly, suggesting a high degree of personalization. This fact, along with each individual’s unique tone of voice, likely plays a role in individual recognition among gibbons across territorial borders.
Like the great call, this pair duet is a territorial message. However, it carries another message as well: the strength of the pair’s social bond. Essentially it means something along the lines of “I’m a male gibbon and I’m with her” and “I’m a female gibbon and I’m with him”. A listener will be able to tell how long a pair has been together simply by judging how well they sing together. Newly formed pairs go through a lengthy process of adjusting their vocal contributions so that their songs complement one another. This process can take months to learn properly. As their relationship matures, their coordination improves. The male must pay attention to the female’s vocals, so he can adjust his vocals accordingly.
But these pair duets aren’t all about announcing undying love or defense of their favorite hill or treetop; it’s also about listening to others. Distant pairs will respond to their song with their own pair-bonded duets with their own information. The duets involve rapid, clear notes from both the male and the female known as climax-coda sequences. Once the climax-coda sequence is heard from a distant pair, the male and female stop and listen. The structure of the gibbon’s great call is such that it allows gibbons to detect and prepare to listen to the climax-coda sequences of distant gibbons, further honing this long-distance communication tool. In the moments of listening, the pair is able to identify the territory of nearby gibbons and assess the bond strength of distant pairs. It may also help with natal dispersal by giving mature offspring an idea of where potential mates, rivals, or other groups might be.
Predator songs are exactly what they sound like—vocalizations used to identify predators to the family group, recruit group members in defense, alert family members in adjacent territories, and let the predator know they have been seen. Interestingly, white-handed gibbons use these songs strictly for ground predators, such as tigers, clouded leopards, and reticulated pythons, and not for aerial predators such as raptors. Predator songs have a longer duration than duet songs and are produced by almost everyone in the family group.
Songs also reveal various attributes about the singer, such as gender and age. Males sing at a higher pitch than females. Counterintuitively, a family of hormones, known as androgens, the most famous of which is testosterone, is what produces higher voices among male gibbons. One reason for this may be that females select males with higher-pitched voices, suggesting that male calls carry with them messages about their sexual status and virility.
Males also have their own phrases in gibbon songs. These phrases are characterized by lip-smacking and modulation of sounds at rates similar to those observed in human speech. Male gibbons, for example, are the only ones to produce “trills”, a type of modulation that contains many notes per exhalation. Like human speech, these vocalizations are produced exclusively during exhalation and exhibit a kind of rhythm. This is unique in the primate world where vocalizations can occur both through exhalation and inhalation, and tend to fit fewer sounds into a breathing cycle.
On the other hand, dominant females tend to use more of the basic 6 notes than others in the group, possibly because they are issuing instructions. The mother is also the one who teaches both sons and daughters how to sing. Gibbon mothers and daughters will co-sing female-specific songs which help the child learn how to sing. Interestingly, up until at least 5 years of age, juvenile and adolescent males also produce female-like great calls when co-singing with their mothers. As these males reach sexual maturity, they gradually transition to producing male-specific vocalizations.
The song also reveals age-related information about the singer. Younger adult males, for example, will produce longer calls than senior males. Likewise, aging females produce weaker great calls with a notable decline in tempo and frequency. Both of these examples likely signal a change in reproductive status.
Songs are elaborate acoustic structures made up of a variety of “notes” or “units” that alone or in conjunction with other “notes” convey a variety of context-dependent meanings. Researchers have isolated 7 basic vocal notes:
(1) The “hoo” note stands out for its wide range of versatility and its central role in communication. Acoustically, it is a low-frequency quiet note that consistently spans a much narrower frequency range than “wa” notes. It is used while feeding, when separated from group members, when encountering predators when interacting with neighbors, and also within the elegant duet songs of mated pairs. While both male and female gibbons use the “hoo” note, the frequency of this note is different between the sexes when used in different calls. While it is hard to know, researchers think this might indicate that males and females emphasize different messages during communication or that there exist different roles between male and female gibbons. Already this “hoo” note has been diced into six separate subunits (with more subunits being likely). The versatility of the “hoo” note demonstrates that white-handed gibbons modify their calls to convey messages or emotions based on specific situations.
(2) The “wa” note is a loud and penetrating note that is short and rises steeply, consistently spanning over 100 Hz in frequency range. On a spectrogram, it appears as more or less a straight or sometimes slightly concave line. The “wa” takes center stage in the duetting song between pair-bonded gibbons. The male solo song consists of a sequence of different note types, including repetitions of the “wa” note, organized into distinct phrases. During the duet, the male and female combine their respective “wa” notes together (and other notes in what is called an antiphonal pattern in which they take turns vocalizing in a coordinated way). Being loud and high-pitched, the “wa” note travels long distances, advertising its presence to neighbors. In this context, it contributes to the strengthening of the pair bond and signals a joint territorial defense between mated partners.
(3) Like the “wa” note, the “leaning wa” is also a loud and penetrating note, reaching amplitudes of 100 decibels, only the “leaning wa” is longer in duration than the “wa” notes. On a spectrogram, it appears to lean or slant to the right, and may also have a slight bump or inflection in the middle of it. It is one of the building blocks used in duets and predator songs. It is also used in the male solo song during the “great call” together with other note types such as “wa”, “hoo” and “oo” to make up distinct phrases.
(4) The “oo” note is of a relatively flat note, of even pitch and varying duration. At times, it may rise slightly at the start, the significance of which is currently unknown. The “oo” note is another ingredient in the duet songs or mated gibbon pairs and occurs typically in the early stanzas of the song. Notably, the “oo” note is rarely used if ever during predator songs. This suggests that whatever the precise meaning of “oo”, it doesn’t convey meaning about predators, but rather may play a role in communicating social information.
(5) The “sharp wow” note is a loud and penetrating note. It rises steeply at first then falls steeply to produce a concave curve. It invariably spans more than 700 Hz in the frequency domain. It is associated with conveying information about predatory threats or perceived social threats. As the name might suggest, the “sharp wow” is used in response to predators, and is most commonly incorporated towards the ends of “predator songs”. Interestingly, the “sharp wow” is incorporated into duet songs when a social threat is detected as well, for example when a neighboring group is counter-singing or when the singing occurs at relatively close distances.
(6) The “waoo” note is highly variable and spans a much lower frequency range than the ‘sharp wow’. It always rises steeply at first, but then may hold pitch at an even level or fall in pitch to create a convex curve. The wahoo appears early in the duet songs between bonded pairs. Though it occurs in “predator songs”, it is rather rare, suggesting it has less to do with predators.
(7) The “other” group consisted of notes that didn’t quite fit into the shapes and definitions of the other notes. The researchers believe these may warrant their own unique note category at a future date. They were often highly variable.
Of course, notes are rarely, if ever, produced in isolation. Rather, they are strung together into structures called “phrases” or “figures”. These phrases then make up “songs”. So while many of the notes above are used in similar situations, such as predator calls or the duet song, they carry subtly different meanings in different sequences.
To make things even more complex, sometimes it’s not what you say, it’s how you say it. Gibbons will introduce a wobbly or trembling quality to one of the six notes mentioned above. Researchers are still deciphering what these variations might mean, but they are getting closer to breaking the code.
The white-handed gibbon’s family typically consists of a mated male and female pair along with their offspring. Occasionally, a group will have two or more adult males, but this is relatively rare. Instead, a male and female white-handed gibbon tend to be monogamous and form lifelong relationships. These strong pair bonds are maintained through a high rate of contact, such as grooming. Grooming is reciprocal, but females tend to groom males more often than vice versa.
White-handed gibbons are mostly monogamous but they display some flexibility. For example, upon the loss or death of a mate, a new mate may be taken. They will also employ complex sexual and social strategies that go beyond monogamous pair bonding. Females are known to occasionally mate with multiple males in a situation known as “polyandry”. Polyandry usually occurs when the female’s home range is large and high-quality food patches are dispersed throughout it. In these cases, the female will form a temporary trio with two adult males. The advantage of this may be that multiple males can help to defend access to these scattered food sources within their home range.
Female white-handed gibbons reach sexual maturity somewhere between 6 and 9 years old while males reach it more often around 9 years old. Mating can occur in any month of the year, and females are not restrained to periods of fertility. Rather, they will mate even during gestation and lactation. Most conceptions occur during the dry season in March with the vast majority of births occurring in October during the late rainy season.
Females will reproduce for the first time at around 11 years old. The gestation period lasts between six and seven months and gives birth, typically, to a single offspring. About every 2.5 years, a female gives birth to a new offspring.
When it comes to infants, mothers tend to be the primary caregivers. However, unlike some primate species, the males also play a role, and so do elder siblings. Young are typically nursed for just under 2 years, being considered weaned at about 20 months. During this period the female shows increasingly aggressive behavior towards the young to facilitate weaning.
Adolescence is a challenging period for white-handed gibbons as they transition toward independence and eventually leave their family group. Increasing aggression from the same-sex parent is what typically forces the maturing infant to become socially and spatially peripheral to the family group.
Gibbons are gardeners, landscapers, and shapers of their environment. It is almost as though white-handed gibbons have a special partnership with the trees in which they live. Being frugivores, they consume a wide variety of fruits, berries, and flowers from different plant species in the upper canopy of the forest. In return for this sustenance, the gibbons pollinate flowers and disperse seeds far and wide. In science, they are referred to as a “keystone” or “umbrella” species because many other species in the forest rely on their behaviors.
Gibbons only consume about 16 percent of the fruit they eat but tend to swallow the seeds attached to the fruit pulp. After digesting the pulp, they excrete the seeds, effectively dispersing them across the forest floor and aiding in the regeneration of plant species. This seed dispersal doesn’t only help maintain the biodiversity and ecological balance of the rainforest ecosystem, it is essential to its existence. As primary dispersal agents, white-handed gibbons drop the seeds to the forest floor where rats and ants then act as secondary dispersers, burying the seeds in soil, and enhancing their germination. Seedlings that grow from seeds dispersed by gibbons have a better chance of survival in their first year. This is because seedlings that germinate closer to the parent tree face intense competition for resources like light, water, and nutrients from the parent tree itself as well as other established vegetation. By dispersing seeds away from the parent tree, gibbons reduce this competition, giving the seedlings a better chance to access the necessary resources for growth and survival. Areas around the parent tree often have higher densities of seed predators, herbivores, and pathogens that can attack and kill seedlings. Dispersing seeds away from these high-density areas reduces the risk of density-dependent mortality factors, increasing the chances of seedling survival. Gibbon seed dispersal can also transport seeds to new, potentially more favorable habitats or microhabitats. These new sites may have fewer competitors, better soil conditions, or other factors that enhance seedling establishment and survival compared to the immediate vicinity of the parent tree.
Finally, to solidify their role as gardeners of the forest, white-handed gibbons also prune the canopy. White-handed gibbons are arboreal and spend most of their time in the upper and middle canopy layers of the rainforest. Their movement through the canopy helps prune the vegetation, allowing sunlight to penetrate and promoting new growth.
Sadly, the futures of these magnificent creatures are at stake. Already, the white-handed gibbon’s song has begun to fade from these forests. As of November 22, 2015, the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) has categorized them as Endangered on their Red List of Threatened Species (IUCN, 2015), and little has changed since. Populations continue to plummet.
The main threat to white-handed gibbons is hunting, having replaced forest clearance as the primary threat. However, this hunting is still related to deforestation and logging. Loggers, venturing deep into the jungle in search of highly valuable, and endangered, rosewood trees (Hongmu), poach gibbons for bushmeat. These illegal rosewood logging operations have penetrated deep into Thai national parks like Thap Lan, which is part of the UNESCO World Heritage Dong Phayayen-Khao Yai Forest Complex, an area home to endangered gibbon species including white-handed gibbons.
These illegal logging operations are a disaster for the forest in more ways than one. Not only are the loggers reaping the forest of precious and rare species, they are also robbing it of its future in the form of seeds. Trees, such as the zoochorous, depend on seed dispersal to maintain healthy populations. As critical seed dispersers like white-handed gibbons are hunted to local extinction, the seeds are no longer spread across the forest, curtailing their chances of survival.
In other regions, such as Bukit Barisan Selatan National Park in Indonesia, human poverty levels are such that people depend on bushmeat, like gibbons, to meet basic nutritional needs. And, indigenous groups who have depended on gibbon bushmeat for millennia, continue to hunt these species for subsistence. With all the other demands, all manner of species in this area are buckling under the pressures of overharvesting.
But loggers aren’t the only ones cutting into these forests. Roads and railways slash across what was once pristine jungle, leaving scars visible from the air. The development of roads and railroads often involves clearing vegetation, which reduces the available habitat for gibbons and increases “edge effects” (changes in a population due to a boundary), making the remaining habitat less suitable for their survival. The construction of roads and railroads fragments gibbon habitats, dividing their home ranges and creating barriers that disrupt their movement and dispersal patterns. This can lead to population isolation and reduced gene flow, increasing the risk of inbreeding and local extinctions.
In addition, these roads bring with them more hunters, trappers, loggers, developers, and the like. Small communities begin to fishbone from these clear-cut roads, bringing with them trucks, light pollution, and more people. Like many species, gibbons can be killed by vehicles while attempting to cross roads or railroads, especially in areas where their home range is bisected by these transportation corridors.
Light pollution is an often overlooked threat to species as well. Artificial light at night can interfere with the natural light-dark cycles that regulate the circadian rhythms of gibbons, potentially affecting their sleep patterns, activity levels, and other physiological processes. In some cases, artificial lighting may also make gibbons more visible to predators at night, increasing their vulnerability to predation, especially when they are resting in their sleeping trees. Though white-handed gibbons are more likely to avoid these areas of light pollution altogether, leading to further habitat fragmentation in these areas.
Many of the same illegal logging gangs are also responsible for capturing white-handed gibbons for tourism entertainment and the pet trade. Infant gibbons are taken from the wild, often after their parents are intentionally killed, to be sold as pets or used as tourist attractions and photo props. In the pet trade, gibbons endure highly variable treatment and living conditions. They may be reared in abusive conditions with no contact with other gibbons. The lack of interaction with other gibbons leads to the development of abnormal behaviors like those seen in deprived captive primates. Many exhibit behavioral issues that cannot be modified later in life, preventing their rehabilitation and release back into the wild.
As more evidence for the fact that gibbons need their own protected space far from humans, data shows that even ecotourism, where tourists can view white-handed gibbons in their habitat, can be detrimental to the species if not properly regulated. When tourists are present, gibbons increase their travel and vigilance behavior at the cost of resting, indicating a stress response. In addition, uncontrolled tourism can lead to risks of disease transmission, overcrowding, and excessive habituation to humans.
Valuable timber isn’t the only commodity driving habitat loss for white-handed gibbons. Shifting agriculture and commercial plantations for monoculture palm oil and other crops also poses a significant threat. Southeast Asia is losing 1.2 percent of rainforest every year — among the highest rates in the world, behind only the Amazon rainforest. Much of it (31 percent) has been converted into cropland and plantations, particularly in mountainous regions. As of now, Southeast Asia has lost more than half of its original forests. At this rate, over 40 percent of the region’s biodiversity is predicted to be extinct by 2100.
Oil palm plantations are responsible for the majority of this widespread destruction in Indonesia, Malaysia, and other local regions. Since 1980, land use to grow palm oil has quadrupled to meet global demands, deforesting the equivalent of an estimated 300 football fields of forest every hour. This large-scale deforestation directly destroys and fragments the gibbon’s natural forest habitat, leaving populations isolated and vulnerable. In northern Sumatra, most of the lowland forests have already been completely logged. This is a depressing predictor of what will likely happen in other areas if things don’t change.
At the heart of it, conserving the charismatic white-handed gibbon and the multitude of other species in these regions is a problem of economics. Palm oil has been praised in Southeast Asia for pulling millions out of abject poverty, but at what cost to the future? Not only do these regions harbor the vast majority of the world’s wildlife, they are critical buffers for climate change, storing vast amounts of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, and recycling and generating rainfall that is essential for agriculture.
Even if deforestation magically stopped overnight, it would take a long time for white-handed gibbons to return to regions where new trees were planted. White-handed gibbons (and many other species) depend on tall trees, lush crowns, and canopy connectivity to survive. One study in the Sikundur region of the Gunung Leuser National Park, North Sumatra, showed that the size of white-handed gibbon populations was directly dependent on the height of trees and canopy connectivity. While other studies show some flexibility of behavior in regenerating forests, ultimately white-handed gibbons need tall trees to stay protected from predators and to make their great calls. Without them, we lose that awe-inspiring and enigmatic call of the wild.
Because white-handed gibbons live across Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Thailand, and northern Sumatra (Indonesia), conservation challenges are unique to each country, their government, the culture and societal beliefs, economic status, terrain, and a variety of other factors.
On paper, white-handed gibbons are a protected species in all the countries across their range, as dictated by Appendix I of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species, a multilateral treaty enacted to protect wildlife. This means trade in specimens of Appendix I species is generally prohibited except for non-commercial purposes like scientific research, under strict regulation with both import and export permits required.
The first practical step towards conserving white-handed gibbons would be to minimize their largest threat: poaching and hunting. While several parks exist to protect white-handed gibbons and other local flora and fauna, protection can be difficult. Large conservation organizations work to build programs that train hundreds of local forest rangers and park staff to prevent habitat loss and combat illegal hunting and trade of gibbons. But poor enforcement continues to dog efforts.
Boots on the ground can be expensive and sometimes conservation organizations need to resort to technology to monitor illegal movements within parks. Acoustic and camera traps are sometimes recruited as a passive method of detecting illegal loggers and poachers so that parks can make better use of limited human resources.
While it’s hard to say exactly how these countries’ policies are affecting white-handed gibbons specifically, it’s still worth taking a look at how the different countries within the white-handed gibbon’s range are dealing with poaching and hunting.
In 2011, the Lao government launched a National Gibbon Conservation Action Plan with coordination from the IUCN and Fauna & Flora International (FFI). This plan aimed to improve the status of all gibbon species in Laos, including the white-handed gibbon. Despite this Laos is internationally known as a major perpetrator of the illegal wildlife trade. Its “porous borders” make it a gateway for international wildlife trafficking due to limited enforcement capacity.
While all five gibbon species found in Malaysia are protected under wildlife laws, many are thought to be trafficked through this country. Only 1 in 20 poached gibbons is thought to survive the journey to the final buyer. However, the Malaysian government has been attempting to crack down on this trafficking, though more work is needed. The Department of Wildlife and National Parks (PERHILITAN) is the government agency responsible for enforcing wildlife protection laws. There have been successful seizures of illegal wildlife and voluntary surrender campaigns for pet gibbons. The Gibbon Conservation Society Malaysia runs the Gibbon Rehabilitation Project to rescue poached gibbons and rehabilitate them for potential release back into the wild. However, this rehabilitation process is long, taking 7-10 years per gibbon, to ensure they meet the criteria for physical and mental well-being before release.
Thailand established the ASEAN Wildlife Enforcement Network (ASEAN-WEN) to improve regional cooperation against wildlife crime. The Gibbon Rehabilitation Project has rehabilitated and reintroduced several white-handed gibbon families into protected areas like Khao Phra Thaew since 2002, helping re-establish a small population. Eleven infants have been born in the reintroduced white-handed gibbon population, including a second wild-born generation.
Forest protection is absolutely critical to the survival of white-handed gibbons. For example in Thailand, no large populations of white-handed gibbons exist outside of conservation areas. Conservation organizations like the Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) provide technical support to local governments to create and expand protected areas critical for gibbons across their range in Asia and combat habitat loss. In spite of this, these protected areas continue to be shaved down.
Currently, Indonesia has a network of national parks and protected areas such as Sebangau National Park in Kalimantan (Borneo), Harapan Rainforest, and four national parks in Jambi Province, Sumatra. That said, these protected areas in Indonesia have only avoided 3.93 percent of forest loss compared to unprotected areas. Malaysia has been more successful than Indonesia at protecting its forests, avoiding 14.57 percent of forest loss — the highest rate in Southeast Asia. They have also pledged to keep at least 50 percent of its land under natural forest cover. In Thailand, logging in protected natural forests was banned in 1989. Despite this, illegal logging continues and these areas have avoided only 5.62 percent of forest loss compared to unprotected areas. Myanmar has only avoided 2.28 percent of the forest loss in its protected areas, the lowest rate in the region. Finally, Laos has avoided 10.31 percent of its protected forest loss.
Setting aside protected forests hasn’t prevented habitat fragmentation. Researchers are exploring ways to bridge dangerous roads where species like white-handed gibbons are vulnerable to predation, disease and parasites, and accidental fatalities from cars, trucks, and electric lines. A couple of groups of researchers have tested out canopy bridges over roads that could connect different habitats. These bridges are made with thick climbing rope. This research is still in its infancy, but two successful cases of white-handed gibbons crossing the rope bridge in Thailand have been promising.
- Barlett, T.Q. (2003). Intragroup and intergroup social interactions in white-handed gibbons. Int J Primatol. pp. 239–59.
- Brandon-Jones, D; Eudey, AA; Geissmann, T; Groves, CP; Melnick, DJ; Morales, JC; Shekelle, M; Stewart, CB (2004). “Asian primate classification”. Int J Primatol. 25: 97–164. doi:10.1023/B:IJOP.0000014647.18720.32. S2CID 29045930.
- Chivers, DJ (1972). “The siamang and the gibbon in the Malay Peninsula”. In Rumbaugh, D. (ed.). Gibbon and Siamang. Vol. 1. Basel & New York: S. Karger. pp. 103–135.
- Brockelman WY, Reichard U, Treesucon U, Raemaekers JJ (1998). Dispersal, pair formation and social structure in gibbons (Hylobates lar). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 42. pp. 329–39.
- Ellefson, JO (1974). “A natural history of white-handed gibbons in the Malayan peninsula”. In Rumbaugh, D. (ed.). Gibbon and Siamang. Vol. 3. Basel & New York: S. Karger. pp. 1–136.
- Estoque, R.C., Ooba, M., Avitabile, V. et al. The future of Southeast Asia’s forests. Nat Commun 10, 1829 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09646-4
- Geissmann, T. (2007). “Status reassessment of the gibbons: Results of the Asian Primate Red List Workshop 2006” (PDF). Gibbon Journal. 3: 5–15. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.694.8483.
- Light, L.E.O., Savini, T., Sparks, C.S. et al. White-handed gibbons (Hylobates lar) alter ranging patterns in response to habitat type. Primates62, 77–90 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-020-00858-7
- Asensio, N., Brockelman, W.Y., Malaivijitnond, S. and Reichard, U.H. (2014), White-handed Gibbon (Hylobates lar) Core Area Use Over a Short-Time Scale. Biotropica, 46: 461-469. https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12121
- Savini, T., Boesch, C. and Reichard, U.H. (2009), Varying Ecological Quality Influences the Probability of Polyandry in White-handed Gibbons (Hylobates lar) in Thailand. Biotropica, 41: 503-513. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2009.00507.x
- Front. Ecol. Evol., 19 March 2021Sec. Biogeography and Macroecology, Volume 9 – 2021 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.634711
- Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. (2021). Section: Biogeography and Macroecology. Volume 9. Retrieved March 19, 2021, from https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.634711
- Wildlife Conservation Society. (n.d.). Southeast Asian Archipelago. WCS.org
- Lar gibbon (Hylobates lar) (thainationalparks.com)
- Lar gibbon – Wisconsin National Primate Research Center – UW–Madison
- https://news.mongabay.com/2022/02/malaysias-white-handed-gibbons-may-be-two-subspecies-not-one-study-shows/
- Chan, YC., Roos, C., Inoue-Murayama, M. et al. Inferring the evolutionary histories of divergences in Hylobates and Nomascus gibbons through multilocus sequence data.BMC Evol Biol 13, 82 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-13-82
- Matsudaira K, Reichard UH, Ishida T, Malaivijitnond S (2022) Introgression and mating patterns between white-handed gibbons (Hylobates lar) and pileated gibbons (Hylobates pileatus) in a natural hybrid zone. PLoS ONE 17(3): e0264519. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264519
- Gani M, Rovie-Ryan JJ, Sitam FT, Kulaimi NAM, Zheng CC, Atiqah AN, Rahim NMA, Mohammed AA. Taxonomic and genetic assessment of captive White-Handed Gibbons (Hylobateslar) in Peninsular Malaysia with implications towards conservation translocation and reintroduction programmes. Zookeys. 2021 Dec 8;1076:25-41. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.1076.73262. PMID: 34975272; PMCID: PMC8674214.
- Sapolsky, R. M. (2017). Behave: The biology of humans at our best and worst. Penguin Books.
- Elder, A.A. (2009). Hylobatid Diets Revisited: The Importance of Body Mass, Fruit Availability, and Interspecific Competition. In: Whittaker, D., Lappan, S. (eds) The Gibbons. Developments in Primatology: Progress and Prospects. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-88604-6_8
- Jildmalm, R., Amundin, M. & Laska, M. Food Preferences and Nutrient Composition in Captive White-handed Gibbons, Hylobates lar . Int J Primatol 29, 1535–1547 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-008-9314-1
- Palombit, R.A. 1997. Inter- and intra-specific variation in the diets of sympatric siamang (Hylobates syndactylus) and lar gibbons (Hylobates lar). Folia Primatologica 68:321–337.
- Raemaekers, J.J. 1978a. The sharing of food sources between two gibbon species in the wild. The Malayan Nature Journal 31:181–188.
- Raemaekers, J.J. 1978b. Changes through the day in the food choice of wild gibbons. Folia Primatologica 30:194–205.
- Raemaekers, J.J., Aldrich-Blake, F.P.G. and Payne, R.B. 1980. The forest. In Malayan Forest Primates: Ten Years’ Study in Tropical Rain Forest, D.J. Chivers (ed.), pp. 29–62. London: Plenum Press.
- Suwanvecho, U., Brockelman, W.Y., Nathalang, A., Santon, J., Matmoon, U., Somnuk, R. and Mahannop, N. (2018), High interannual variation in the diet of a tropical forest frugivore (Hylobates lar). Biotropica, 50: 346-356. https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12525
- Reichard U. Sleeping sites, sleeping places, and presleep behavior of gibbons (Hylobates lar). Am J Primatol. 1998;46(1):35-62. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2345(1998)46:1<35::AID-AJP4>3.0.CO;2-W. PMID: 9730212.
- Kopsch, N. T. (2018). A cooperation experiment in captive white-handed gibbons (Hylobates lar) [Master’s thesis, Linköping University]. Institute for Physics, Chemistry and Biology (IFM).
- Gron KJ. 2010 November 17. Primate Factsheets: Lar gibbon (Hylobates lar) Taxonomy, Morphology, & Ecology . <http://pin.primate.wisc.edu/factsheets/entry/lar_gibbon/taxon>. Accessed 2020 July 21.
- Bandini E, Tennie C. Exploring the role of individual learning in animal tool-use. PeerJ. 2020 Sep 25;8:e9877. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9877. PMID: 33033659; PMCID: PMC7521350.
- Walker, M. (2017). Why we sleep: Unlocking the power of sleep and dreams. Scribner.
- Clarke, Esther & Reichard, Ulrich & Zuberbühler, Klaus. (2011). The anti-predator behaviour of wild white-handed gibbons (Hylobates lar). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 66. 10.1007/s00265-011-1256-5.
- Barelli, C., Boesch, C., Heistermann, M., & Reichard, U. (2008). Female white-handed gibbons (Hylobates lar) lead group movements and have priority of access to food resources. Behaviour, 145(7), 965-981. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853908784089243
- Bartlett, T.Q., Light, L.E.O. and Brockelman, W.Y. (2016), Long-term home range use in white-handed gibbons (Hylobates lar) in Khao Yai National Park, Thailand. Am. J. Primatol., 78: 192-203. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.22492
- Claudia Barelli, Ulrich H. Reichard, Roger Mundry, Is grooming used as a commodity in wild white-handed gibbons, Hylobates lar?, Animal Behaviour, Volume 82, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 801-809, ISSN 0003-3472, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.07.012.
- Reichard, U., & Sommer, V. (1997). Group Encounters in Wild Gibbons (Hylobates Lar): Agonism, Affiliation, and the Concept of Infanticide. Behaviour, 134(15-16), 1135-1174. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853997X00106
- Reichard, U., Sommer, V. Grooming site preferences in wild white-handed gibbons (Hylobates lar).Primates 35, 369–374 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02382733
- Matsudaira K, Reichard UH, Ishida T, Malaivijitnond S. Introgression and mating patterns between white-handed gibbons (Hylobates lar) and pileated gibbons (Hylobates pileatus) in a natural hybrid zone. PLoS One. 2022 Mar 31;17(3):e0264519. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264519. PMID: 35358199; PMCID: PMC8970389.
- Clarke E, Reichard UH, Zuberbühler K (2006) The Syntax and Meaning of Wild Gibbon Songs. PLoS ONE 1(1): e73. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000073
- Clarke, E., Reichard, U.H. & Zuberbühler, K. Context-specific close-range “hoo” calls in wild gibbons (Hylobates lar). BMC Evol Biol 15, 56 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-015-0332-2
- Clarke, E. (2011). “The Anti-Predator Behaviour of Wild White-Handed Gibbons (Hylobates Lar)” (PDF). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
- Geissmann, Thomas. “Sound Gallery: Hylobates lar”. Retrieved 2009-04-29.
- Geissmann, Thomas. “Gibbon Systematics and Species Identification”. Retrieved 2006-04-13.
- Koda, H. (2016). Gibbon Songs: Understanding the Evolution and Development of This Unique Form of Vocal Communication. In: Reichard, U., Hirai, H., Barelli, C. (eds) Evolution of Gibbons and Siamang. Developments in Primatology: Progress and Prospects. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-5614-2_15
- Terleph, T., Saralamba, C. & Reichard, U.H. Long-Distance Vocal Signaling in White-Handed Gibbons (Hylobates lar). Int J Primatol 43, 965–986 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-022-00312-z
- Terleph TA, Malaivijitnond S, Reichard UH. An analysis of white-handed gibbon male song reveals speech-like phrases. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2018; 166: 649–660. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23451
- Terleph, T.A., Malaivijitnond, S. & Reichard, U.H. Male white-handed gibbons flexibly time duet contributions.Behav Ecol Sociobiol 72, 16 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-017-2432-z
- Toshinori Okuda, Haruka Matsubara, Toshihiro Yamada, Wei Chuang Chew, Alvin Meng Shin Lau, Jacquoelyne Paska, Hiromitsu Nishizaki, Nur Shifatil Ulya binti Sidek Omar, Mohamed Zakaria, Spatial distribution of white-handed gibbon calls in relation to forest vertical components, Malaysia, from a perspective of forest management, Global Ecology and Conservation, Volume 38, 2022, e02245, ISSN 2351-9894, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2022.e02245 .
- Fan PF, Ma CY, Garber PA, Zhang W, Fei HL, Xiao W. Rhythmic displays of female gibbons offer insight into the origin of dance. Sci Rep. 2016 Sep 30;6:34606. doi: 10.1038/srep34606. PMID: 27687686; PMCID: PMC5043361.
- https://www.gibbonssp.org/vocalizations
- Palombit RA. Lethal territorial aggression in a white-handed gibbon. Am J Primatol. 1993;31(4):311-318. doi: 10.1002/ajp.1350310407. PMID: 31936991.
- Barelli, C; Heistermann, M; Boesch, C; Reichard, UH (2008). “Mating patterns and sexual swellings in pair-living and multimale groups of wild white-handed gibbons, Hylobates lar”. Animal Behaviour. 75 (3): 991–1001. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.08.012. S2CID 53165961.
- Barelli, C; Boesch, C; Heistermann, M; Reichard, UH (2008). “Female white-handed gibbons (Hylobates lar) lead group movements and have priority of access to food resources” (PDF). Behaviour. 145 (7): 965–81. doi:10.1163/156853908784089243.
- Barelli C, Heistermann M, Boesch C, Reichard UH (2007). “Sexual swellings in wild white-handed gibbon females (Hylobates lar) indicate the probability of ovulation”. Hormones and Behavior. 51 (2): 221–30. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.516.8946. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2006.10.008. PMID 17137580. S2CID 39378245.
- Claudia Barelli, Michael Heistermann, Christophe Boesch, Ulrich H. Reichard, Mating patterns and sexual swellings in pair-living and multimale groups of wild white-handed gibbons, Hylobates lar, Animal Behaviour, Volume 75, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 991-1001, ISSN 0003-3472,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.08.012.
- Matsudaira K, Reichard UH, Ishida T, Malaivijitnond S (2022) Introgression and mating patterns between white-handed gibbons (Hylobates lar) and pileated gibbons (Hylobates pileatus) in a natural hybrid zone. PLOS ONE 17(3): e0264519. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264519
- Terleph, T.A., Malaivijitnond, S. & Reichard, U.H. Age related decline in female lar gibbon great call performance suggests that call features correlate with physical condition. BMC Evol Biol 16, 4 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-015-0578-8
- Hradec M, Illmann G, Bartoš L, Bolechová P. The transition from the female-like great calls to male calls during ontogeny in southern yellow-cheeked gibbon males (Nomascus gabriellae). Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 11;11(1):22040. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01648-x. PMID: 34764403; PMCID: PMC8586049.
- Clarke E, Reichard UH, Zuberbühler K. The syntax and meaning of wild gibbon songs. PLoS One. 2006 Dec 20;1(1):e73. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000073. PMID: 17183705; PMCID: PMC1762393.
- Andrieu J, Penny SG, Bouchet H, Malaivijitnond S, Reichard UH, Zuberbühler K. White-handed gibbons discriminate context-specific song compositions. PeerJ. 2020 Aug 3;8:e9477. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9477. PMID: 32832260; PMCID: PMC7409784.
- Gibbon calls decoded | Interviews (thenakedscientists.com)
- https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/bmcseriesblog/2015/04/08/decoding-the-whispers-of-gibbons/
- Barelli C, Mundry R, Heistermann M, Hammerschmidt K (2013) Cues to Androgens and Quality in Male Gibbon Songs. PLoS ONE 8(12): e82748. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082748
- Clarke, E., Reichard, U.H. & Zuberbühler, K. Context-specific close-range “hoo” calls in wild gibbons (Hylobates lar). BMC Evol Biol 15, 56 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-015-0332-2
- Andrieu J, Penny SG, Bouchet H, Malaivijitnond S, Reichard UH, Zuberbühler K. White-handed gibbons discriminate context-specific song compositions. PeerJ. 2020 Aug 3;8:e9477. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9477. PMID: 32832260; PMCID: PMC7409784.
- Brockelman, W. & Geissmann, T. (2008). Hylobates lar. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2008, e.T10548A3199623, <https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T10548A3199623.en>.
- Corlett, R. T. (2017). Frugivory and seed dispersal by vertebrates in tropical and subtropical Asia: an update. Global Ecology and Conservation, 11, 1-22.
- Dai, R., Ngoprasert, D., Gale, G. A., & Savini, T. (2018). Secondary removal of seeds dispersed by gibbons (Hylobates lar) in a tropical dry forest in Thailand. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, 66.
- Warren Y. Brockelman, Kim R. McConkey, Anuttara Nathalang, Rathasart Somnnuk, Jantima Santon, Umaporn Matmoon, Dispersal success of a specialized tropical tree depends on complex interactions among diverse mammalian frugivores, Global Ecology and Conservation, Volume 40, 2022, e02312, ISSN 2351-9894, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2022.e02312.
- Bartlett, T. Q. 2007. The Hylobatidae: Small Apes of Asia. In: C. J. Campbell, A. Fuentes, M. K. C. M. Panger and S. K. Bearder (eds), Primates in Perspective, pp. 274-289. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
- Hankinson, E., 2017. Spatial distribution and density of the Lar gibbon Hylobates lar and Siamang Symphalangus syndactylus in relation to canopy structure and disturbance in a lowland dipterocarp forest, Sumatra. Masters Thesis (Masters). Bournemouth University.
- Malone, N. M., Purnama, A. R., Wedana, M. and Fuentes, A. 2001. Assessing the trade of primates in Indonesia and the collection of non-invasively obtained cytogenic evidence . American Journal of Physical Anthropology 32 (Supplement): 101.
- Osterberg, P., Samphanthamit, P., Maprang, O., Punnadee, S. and Brockelman, W. 2014. Population dynamics of a reintroduced population of captive raised gibbons (Hylobates lar) in Phuket, Thailand. Primate Conservation 28: 179-188.
- Osterberg, P. Samphanthamit, P., Maprang, O., Punnadee, S. and Brockelman, W. Y. 2015. Gibbon (Hylobates lar) reintroduction success in Phuket, Thailand, and its conservation benefits. American Journal of Primatology 77(5): 492-501.
- Terleph, Thomas & Malaivijitnond, Suchinda & Reichard, Ulrich. (2018). An analysis of white-handed gibbon male song reveals speech-like phrases. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 166. 10.1002/ajpa.23451.
- Clarke E, Reichard UH, Zuberbühler K. The syntax and meaning of wild gibbon songs. PLoS One. 2006 Dec 20;1(1):e73. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000073. PMID: 17183705; PMCID: PMC1762393.
- Terleph TA, Malaivijitnond S, Reichard UH. An analysis of white-handed gibbon male song reveals speech-like phrases. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2018; 166: 649–660. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23451
- Hradec Michal, Illmann Gudrun, Prikrylová Martina, Bolechová Petra, Vostrá-Vydrová Hana. 2023. Difference in the songs of paired and unpaired southern yellow-cheeked gibbon males (Nomascus gabriellae): social status or age?, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, (11): https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2023.956922
- https://projectchimps.org/chimp_vs_gibbon_ape_differences/
- Clarke, Esther & Reichard, Ulrich & Zuberbühler, Klaus. (2006). The Syntax and Meaning of Wild Gibbon Songs. PloS one. 1. e73. 10.1371/journal.pone.0000073.
- https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2908200/Learn-speak-GIBBONish-Scientists-decode-calls-white-handed-primates-develop-ape-dictionary.html
- Terleph, T., Saralamba, C. & Reichard, U.H. Long-Distance Vocal Signaling in White-Handed Gibbons (Hylobates lar). Int J Primatol 43, 965–986 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-022-00312-z
- https://factsanddetails.com/asian/cat68/sub430/item2479.html
- Brockelman, W. Y., Nathalang, A., & McConkey, K. R. (2005). The Role of Gibbons in Forest Regeneration: Seed Dispersal and Regeneration of Nephelium melliferum Gagnep. (Sapindaceae) on the Mo Singto Plot, Khao Yai National Park.
- Phiphatsuwannachai, Suchada & Westcott, David & McKeown, Adam & Savini, Tommaso. (2017). Inter-group variability in seed dispersal by white-handed gibbons in mosaic forest. Biotropica. 50. 10.1111/btp.12499.
- https://news.mongabay.com/2017/01/pileated-gibbons-poached-as-bushmeat-to-feed-illegal-rosewood-loggers/
- Brodie, J.F., Helmy, O.E., Brockelman, W.Y. and Maron, J.L. (2009), Bushmeat poaching reduces the seed dispersal and population growth rate of a mammal-dispersed tree. Ecological Applications, 19: 854-863. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-0955.1
- Chan, B.P.L., Lo, Y.F.P., Hong, XJ. et al. First use of artificial canopy bridge by the world’s most critically endangered primate the Hainan gibbon Nomascus hainanus. Sci Rep 10, 15176 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72641-z
- https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/2008-114.pdf
- https://conservationcorridor.org/ccsg/2023/05/canopy-bridge/
- https://www.academia.edu/1525036/Conservation_Difficulties_for_Hylobates_lar_Effects_the_Illegal_Pet_Trade_has_on_White_handed_Gibbons_Behavioral_Health_and_Successful_Rehabilitation
- https://earth.org/deforestation-in-southeast-asia/
- https://www.statista.com/statistics/620219/palm-oil-export-volume-worldwide-by-country/
- https://ipad.fas.usda.gov/cropexplorer/cropview/commodityView.aspx?cropid=4243000&rankby=Exports&sel_year=2022
- https://oec.world/en/profile/hs/palm-oil-crude
- Nurfatriani F, Ramawati, Sari GK, Saputra W, Komarudin H. Oil Palm Economic Benefit Distribution to Regions for Environmental Sustainability: Indonesia’s Revenue-Sharing Scheme. Land. 2022; 11(9):1452. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11091452
- https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ATAG/2020/659335/EPRS_ATA%282020%29659335_EN.pdf
- https://ippl.org/ippls-gibbon-sanctuary/
- Carolyn Thompson, Ngwe Lwin, Pyae Phyo Aung, Tin Htun Aung, Thura Soe Min Htike, Aye Mi San, Naw May Lay Thant, Christian Roos, Peng-Fei Fan, Koen van Rompay, Mark Grindley, Phyu Pyar Tin, No No Wai, Htoo Htoo Aung Lwin, Kirsten V. Gilardi, Frank Momberg, Susan M. Cheyne, Tierra Smiley Evans,The status of primates and primatology in Myanmar, Global Ecology and Conservation, Volume 47, 2023, e02662, ISSN 2351-9894, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2023.e02662.
- Saralamba, C. & Menpreeda, W. Increasing connectivity through artificial canopy bridge for the gibbons: a case study on the activity budget. Abstract for The 87th Annual Meeting of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists, Austin (Texas) (2018).
- https://www.traffic.org/site/assets/files/9025/wci_annual_review_2015.pdf
- https://www.traffic.org/site/assets/files/3984/in_full_swing.pdf
- https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/14fe3297-en/1/2/1/index.html?_csp_=25b688c51d1ce4e2a7604120f3818d65&itemContentType=book&itemIGO=oecd&itemId=%2Fcontent%2Fpublication%2F14fe3297-en&mimeType=text%2Fhtml
- https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PA00KH52.pdf
- https://www.traffic.org/site/assets/files/5435/whats-driving-wildlife-trade.pdf
- https://www.asiasentinel.com/p/indonesia-illegal-wildlife-poaching
- https://www.ran.org/the-understory/the_failing_fight_to_end_illegal_animal_trade_and_trafficking_in_indonesia/
- https://news.mongabay.com/2011/01/wildlife-crime-goes-largely-unpunished-in-indonesia/
- https://news.mongabay.com/2017/01/pileated-gibbons-poached-as-bushmeat-to-feed-illegal-rosewood-loggers/
- https://news.mongabay.com/2024/02/skywalker-gibbons-confirmed-in-myanmar-for-the-first-time/
- https://news.mongabay.com/2022/07/myanmar-wildlife-trade-remains-opaque-despite-focus-on-border-hubs/
- https://gibbonconservationsociety.org/gibbons/
- https://www.thenationalnews.com/travel/responsible-travel/2021/06/15/song-of-the-primates-one-womans-mission-to-save-malaysias-gibbons/
- https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/22/world/asia/gibbons-thailand-forest.html
- https://www.wfft.org/primates/war-on-gibbon-exploitation-in-tourism-has-started/
- Osterberg P, Samphanthamit P, Maprang O, Punnadee S, Brockelman WY. Gibbon (Hylobates lar) reintroduction success in Phuket, Thailand, and its conservation benefits. Am J Primatol. 2015 May;77(5):492-501. doi: 10.1002/ajp.22367. Epub 2015 Jan 16. PMID: 25597291.
- https://earth.org/deforestation-in-southeast-asia/
- https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2020/652068/EPRS_BRI%282020%29652068_EN.pdf
- Graham V, Geldmann J, Adams VM, Negret PJ, Sinovas P, Chang HC. Southeast Asian protected areas are effective in conserving forest cover and forest carbon stocks compared to unprotected areas. Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 9;11(1):23760. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03188-w. PMID: 34887488; PMCID: PMC8660836.
- https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2021/01/11/indonesia-takes-a-landscape-approach-to-reduce-deforestation-address-climate-change
- Barelli C, Matsudaira K, Wolf T, Roos C, Heistermann M, Hodges K, Ishida T, Malaivijitnond S, Reichard UH. Extra-pair paternity confirmed in wild white-handed gibbons. Am J Primatol. 2013 Dec;75(12):1185-95. doi: 10.1002/ajp.22180. Epub 2013 Jul 22. PMID: 23877831.
- Barelli C, Heistermann M, Boesch C, Reichard UH. Mating patterns and sexual swellings in pair-living and multimale groups of wild white-handed gibbons, Hylobates lar. Animal Behaviour. 2008;75:991-1001. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.08.012
- Zhang H, Gross J, De Dreu C, Ma Y. Oxytocin promotes coordinated out-group attack during intergroup conflict in humans. Elife. 2019 Jan 25;8:e40698. doi: 10.7554/eLife.40698. PMID: 30681410; PMCID: PMC6347450.
- Ziegler TE, Crockford C. Neuroendocrine control in social relationships in non-human primates: Field based evidence. Horm Behav. 2017 May;91:107-121. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2017.03.004. Epub 2017 Mar 11. PMID: 28284710; PMCID: PMC6372243.
- Ma, Y., Liu, Y., Rand, D. et al. Opposing Oxytocin Effects on Intergroup Cooperative Behavior in Intuitive and Reflective Minds.Neuropsychopharmacol 40, 2379–2387 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2015.87
- Edwards AMA, Todd JD. Homosexual Behaviour in Wild White-handed Gibbons (Hylobates lar). Primates. 1991;32(2):231-236.
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_worship
Written by Breton Worthington, May 2024